17
(
(A Noove (0)
.noidool. exonicü - yer fasf neol toll moJmiü
,cosoll est:10 .ois recint...ALA,
#OL. No koloneype of
A
hoa hon of nes mitheN
Ieu/99l.
Joinde nå oba ou tito no mi fa al pont MNL 7 9
to (1) ▼ ampio
13TIVO NI NJ .G&¥.
JA TAYOU
lause 21.
:donidut
lause 22.
#100 # 4 X 4
SOLJOKO ON
ing 1
J
3.
hongroisy talk drobe91.
beliquvo ned meth
Li
B.6 2.
المال
-:erofol
„JIVI,...ØV quwot od lidi tutu nedoded
#
* ABI
#
#
#
齄
#
17
1
ما نباده .
*
ni cd B. pe vone a*
21 0119 XII Batarog umiduch cespho súc no luod
CV 80
JEDOLLS BLI
qumave to be.Am A to D BROT
Bi ona.urtovo) eund.0 oud to JIM JIS VOC 410. NO. Sid
شاہ ایک ان ما دل کی
12.000,0 zhongnok
ul.00 SLMI)
.08 se
206
We would point out that the total of 85,731.48 has been divided by 31 days 2185 per day but this should be divisable by 33 days which covers the period over which the swn was arrived at, this equals 171 per day.
-
were
We cannot recommend the claim made by the Hongkong Government of $20 per day for loss on late running of trains on the Chinese Section. No trains/run therefore no loss could have possibly been made, nor can they draw the inference that because trains ran late one month they should run late in-
-definitely.
In conclusion we state that in our opinion the British Government is due from the Chinese Government the
sum of Hongkong 85,600.41 as settlement of claim for
suspension of traffic from 7th. November, 1911, to 13th.
December, 1911.
(sa.) W. G. Moore,
Acting Engineer-in-Chief.
(Sd.) E. Hall,
Chief Accountant.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.